RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the safety, effectiveness and reproducibility of screening potential neurosurgical patients by means of smartphones. METHODS: This is a retrospective and multicentric study. Data were collected from the medical records of patients subjected to real emergency neurosurgical evaluations and compared with assessments by neurosurgeons using smartphones to determine the feasibility of identifying changes in cranial computed tomography scans, potentially serious conditions of patients, and the need for transfer to reference centers. RESULTS: We analyzed 232 cases. The main diagnosis was traumatic brain injury, with 119 cases (51.3%). Of this, 105 (45.3%) patients were discharged immediately after the assessment. The telemedicine evaluators presented 95.69% accuracy in the identification of changes in computed tomography scans, with 0.858 concordance. Accuracy in the identification of severity was 95.26%, with 0.858 concordance. As for procedure, the concordance among evaluators was 0.672, increasing to 100% in cases that required surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that the use of telemedicine for screening patients with acute neurological disorders was safe, effective and reproducible. Implementation of the method shows a promising potential to improve the patient's outcome by reducing unnecessary transfers and decreasing the time elapsed until a specialist can be consulted.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Smartphone , Telemedicina/instrumentação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/cirurgia , Criança , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telemedicina/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto JovemRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: To ascertain the safety, effectiveness and reproducibility of screening potential neurosurgical patients by means of smartphones. Methods: This is a retrospective and multicentric study. Data were collected from the medical records of patients subjected to real emergency neurosurgical evaluations and compared with assessments by neurosurgeons using smartphones to determine the feasibility of identifying changes in cranial computed tomography scans, potentially serious conditions of patients, and the need for transfer to reference centers. Results: We analyzed 232 cases. The main diagnosis was traumatic brain injury, with 119 cases (51.3%). Of this, 105 (45.3%) patients were discharged immediately after the assessment. The telemedicine evaluators presented 95.69% accuracy in the identification of changes in computed tomography scans, with 0.858 concordance. Accuracy in the identification of severity was 95.26%, with 0.858 concordance. As for procedure, the concordance among evaluators was 0.672, increasing to 100% in cases that required surgical treatment. Conclusion: Our study indicated that the use of telemedicine for screening patients with acute neurological disorders was safe, effective and reproducible. Implementation of the method shows a promising potential to improve the patient's outcome by reducing unnecessary transfers and decreasing the time elapsed until a specialist can be consulted.
RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar a segurança, a efetividade e a reprodutibilidade da triagem de pacientes potencialmente neurocirúrgicos feita por smartphones. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo e multicêntrico. Dados de prontuários dos pacientes submetidos à avaliação neurocirúrgica de urgência foram coletados e comparados com a avaliação realizada por neurocirurgiões por meio de smartphones, determinando a capacidade de identificar alterações na tomografia computadorizada de crânio, pacientes potencialmente graves e necessidade de transferência. Resultados: Foram analisados 232 casos. O principal diagnóstico foi traumatismo crânio encefálico, com 119 casos (51,3%). Destes, 105 (45,3%) tiveram alta após a avaliação. Os avaliadores por telemedicina apresentaram acurácia de 95,69% para identificação de alteração na tomografia computadorizada, com concordância de 0,858. Com relação à identificação de gravidade, a acurácia foi de 95,26%, com concordância de 0,858. Com relação à conduta, os avaliadores apresentaram concordância de 0,672, aumentando para 100% nos casos de tratamento cirúrgico. Conclusão: O uso da telemedicina em nosso estudo foi seguro, efetivo e reprodutível para triagem dos pacientes com afecções neurológicas agudas. A implementação do método tem potencial de impacto na melhora do resultado para o paciente devido à redução das transferências desnecessárias e do tempo até o atendimento.
